Williams v. Han

District Court, D. Nevada

Williams v. Han

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JEREMY WILLIAMS, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01490-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 6] PATRICIA HAN, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On April 17, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Jeremy Williams did not file an amended complaint as 10}| ordered. ECF No. 6. Williams did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de review of the report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings which objection is made’); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (‘‘the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 15}| de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 6) is accepted and plaintiff Jeremy Williams’ complaint (ECF No. 5) is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 8th day of May, 2020. Zo - 20 ANDREW P. GORDON 71 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23

Reference

Status
Unknown