1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Case No.: 2:17-cv-01360-APG-VCF

4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Granting Motion to 5 v. Enforce Settlement Agreement

6 SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 3948 [ECF Nos. 54, 57] APPLECREST, et al., 7 Defendants 8

9 On April 23, 2020, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach recommended that I grant plaintiff Wells 10 Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement between Wells Fargo and 11 defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 3948 Applecrest. ECF No. 57. Saticoy Bay did not file an 12 objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 13 recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 14 determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 15 made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 16 district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 17 objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 18 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach’s report and recommendation 19 (ECF No. 57) is accepted and plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion to enforce settlement 20 agreement (ECF No. 54) is GRANTED. The claims between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and 21 defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 3948 Applecrest are DISMISSED with prejudice. 22 / / / / 23 / / / / 1 I FURTHER ORDER that by May 29, 2020, plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC shall file a stipulation of dismissal based on their settlement agreement. 4 I FURTHER ORDER that by May 29, 2020, plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and defendant Woodcrest Homeowners Association shall file either a stipulation of dismissal or a status report regarding any remaining claims between them. 7 DATED this 8th day of May, 2020. 8 ¢ Ze A EW P. GORDON 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23