1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10) BEHROOZ MOHAZZABI, Case No.: 2:19-cy-02158-RFB-NJK 11 Plaintiff(s), Order 12] v. [Docket Nos. 13, 15] 13] KENT F. LARSEN, 14 Defendant(s). 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 16] the motion to dismiss. Docket No. 13; see also Docket No. 7 (motion to dismiss). No response 17|| has been filed. Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the motion practice and finds that the standards have been met to justify a stay of discovery. See Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 19] F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013). Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery (Docket No. 13) is 20|| hereby GRANTED. 21 In light of this ruling, Plaintiffs discovery plan (Docket No. 15) is also hereby DENIED without prejudice. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: May 20, 2020

Nancy JKoppe 26 United Statés Magistrate Judge 27), ———____ ' Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and, as a result, the Court construes his filings liberally. 28] Erickson v. Pardus,

(2007).