District Court, D. Nevada, 2020

Moraga v. Alley

Moraga v. Alley
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided May 20, 2020
Moraga v. Alley

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ROY D. MORAGA, Case No. 3:19-cv-00635-MMD-CLB 4 Plaintiff ORDER 5 v. DR. ALLEY, et al., 7 Defendants I. DISCUSSION 10 Plaintiff, who is an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), has filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental brief. (ECF No. 5.) The motion includes several factual allegations and claims not included in Plaintiff’s complaint and appears to be an attempt to supplement the complaint. (Id.) The Court will not piecemeal Plaintiff’s complaint together from multiple filings. Plaintiff’s operative complaint must contain all claims, defendants, and factual allegations that Plaintiff wishes to pursue in this lawsuit. As such, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion and grants Plaintiff leave to file a fully complete first amended complaint within 30 days. If Plaintiff does not file a fully complete amended complaint, the court will screen his complaint (ECF No. 1- 1) and will not consider any allegations in Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief.

21 If Plaintiff chooses to file a first amended complaint, he is advised that a first amended complaint supersedes (replaces) the original complaint and, thus, the first amended complaint must be complete in itself. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (holding that “[t]he fact that a party was named in the original complaint is irrelevant; an amended pleading supersedes the original”); see also Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (holding that for claims dismissed with prejudice, a plaintiff is not required to reallege such claims in a subsequent amended complaint to preserve them for appeal). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint must contain all claims, defendants, and factual allegations that 2| Plaintiff wishes to pursue in this lawsuit. Moreover, Plaintiff must file the first amended complaint on this Court's approved prisoner civil rights form, and it must be entitled “First 4| Amended Complaint.”

5] Il. CONCLUSION 6 For the foregoing reasons, IT |S ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to file | asupplemental brief (ECF No. 5) is denied.

8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff chooses to file a first amended 9} complaint, Plaintiff will file the first amended complaint within 30 days from the date of entry of this order.

11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send to Plaintiff the 12 approved form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of his complaint and his motion for leave to file a supplemental brief (ECF Nos. 1-1, 5). If Plaintiff chooses to file a first amended complaint, he must use the approved form and he | will write the words “First Amended” above the words “Civil Rights Complaint” in the | caption.

17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff does not timely file a first amended 18] complaint, the Court will screen the original complaint (ECF No. 1-1) only and strike Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a supplemental brief (ECF No. 5) from the docket.

21 DATED THIS 20th day of May 2020.

22 ‘ 23 UNITED S AGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.