1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 WINNER’S SUN PLASTIC & ELECTRONIC ) 4 (SHENZHEN) CO. LTD., ) ) Case No.: 22:2:109--ccvv--0000885522--GGMMNN--EEJJYY 5 Plaintiff, ) 6 vs. ) ORDER ) 7 THE PARTNERSHIPS AND ) UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS ) 8 IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, ) ) 9 Defendants. ) 10 11 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States 12 Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah, (ECF No. 61), which recommends that default judgment be 13 entered against Defendants named in Schedule A of the Amended Complaint who have not 14 made an appearance in this action. (See Mot. Default J., ECF No. 49); (Default J. Defs., Ex. 1 15 to Mot. Default J., ECF No. 49-2) 16 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 17 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4.

(b)(1)(B); 18 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 19 determination of those portions to which objections are made.

The Court may accept, reject, 20 or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 21

(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is 22 not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an 23 objection.” Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized 24 that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 25 where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia,

, 1 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 2 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so, May 25, 2020, has passed. 3 (Min. Order, ECF No. 61). 4 Accordingly, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 61), is 6 ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED in full. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court GRANTS default judgment against 8 Defendants named in Schedule A of the Amended Complaint who have not made an 9 appearance in this action. The Defendants, as listed in Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff’s Motion for 10 Default Judgment, comprise: AeequeDirect, Alfort, Batterygalaxysales, Bmzx, Brillmall, 11 Casido, Dreamyth, Esellerchina, Hongkongstore2011, HP95, Jvlunas, Kungfurendirect, 12 Lynnerphom, Maggiesuperstore, Motorstarshine, Serviceyingbest, Smileniu9, Subottn, 13 Thumbsup, Wensltd, and Yopujkl1232_8. 14 DATED this __2_7__ day of May, 2020. 15 _____________________________ 16 Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25