1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA CARY LEE PETERSON, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00787-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation, Denying Application to SH v. Proceed in Forma Pauperis, and Setting Deadline to Pay Filing Fee GUARDIAN FOR J. DOE, JOHN DOE, [ECF Nos. 4, 5] 7 Defendant 8 On May 21, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that plaintiff Cary Peterson’s 9} application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that I set a deadline for him to pay the full $400 filing fee. ECF No. 5. Peterson did not file objection. Thus, I am not obligated to 11|}conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring 12}| district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified 13} proposed findings to which objection is made’); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 5) is accepted and plaintiff Cary Peterson’s application for leave to proceed in forma 18} pauperis (ECF No. 4) is DENIED. 19 I FURTHER ORDER that by July 22, 2020, plaintiff Cary Peterson shall pay the full 20] filing fee of $400. Failure to pay the fee will result in this case being dismissed without prejudice. 22 DATED this 22nd day of June, 2020. 2. 23 ee ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE