Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Case No.: 2:15-cv-00133-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motion to v. Amend SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al., [ECF Nos. 55, 73] 7 Defendants 8 On June 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I deny plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s motion to amend. ECF Nos. 73. Nationstar did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 111) § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made’); United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 14} magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 15}| otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 73) is accepted and plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s motion to amend (ECF No. is DENIED.

19 DATED this 22nd day of June, 2020.

20 Z = — 71 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE