Bank of America, N.A. v. Tierra De Las Palmas Owners Association
Bank of America, N.A. v. Tierra De Las Palmas Owners Association
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Case No.: 2:16-cv-01362-APG-NJK
4 Plaintiff Order (1) Accepting and Modifying Report and Recommendation and (2) Directing 5 v. Entry of Default Against Defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC 6 TIERRA DE LAS PALMAS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., [ECF No. 56] 7 Defendants 8 On June 26, 2020, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I enter default judgment 9 against defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC because it has failed to comply with orders 10 to retain counsel to defend itself in this action. ECF No. 56. Absolute did not file an objection. 11 Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28
12 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions 13 of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. 14 Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 15 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 16 otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 However, I modify Judge Koppe’s recommendation to direct entry of default against 18 Absolute, rather than enter default judgment. Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. seeks damages 19 against Absolute and thus far I have no basis to enter a judgment in any amount against 20 Absolute. Indeed, the homeowners association has moved for summary judgment on Bank of 21 America’s claims against it, which are the same as Bank of America’s claims against Absolute, 22 arguing that Bank of America cannot succeed on its claims. See ECF No. 53. Moreover, the 23 deadline for Bank of America to seek summary judgment against Absolute has expired without 1}|the Bank having filed a dispositive motion seeking that relief. In sum, entry of default judgment premature. Consequently, I will direct the clerk of court to strike Absolute’s answer (ECF No. 3}|7) and enter default. 4 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 56) is accepted and modified as follows: The clerk of court is instructed to strike 6}| defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC’s answer (ECF No. 7) and to enter default against 7\| defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC. 8 DATED this 17th day of July, 2020.
10 ANDREW P. GORDON Wl UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Reference
- Status
- Unknown