District Court, D. Nevada, 2020

American Preparatory Schools, Inc. v. Nevada Charter Academies

American Preparatory Schools, Inc. v. Nevada Charter Academies
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided July 27, 2020
American Preparatory Schools, Inc. v. Nevada Charter Academies

Trial Court Opinion

1 LJOIPSSEOPNHNP.EGILASROINN,PE.SCQ. .

2 Nevada Bar No. 6653 LISA J. ZASTROW, ESQ.

3 Nevada Bar No. 9727 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, Nevada89144 Phone: (702) 382-1500 Fax: (702)382-1512 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys forDefendantsNevada Charter Academies dba American Preparatory Academy–LasVegas, Lee Iglody, Jonathan Gardner, Melissa St. Jean, Ernie Elliott, Candyce Farthing 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 * * * AMERICAN PREPARATORY SCHOOLS, ) Case No: 2:20-cv-01205-JAD-NJK INC., aUtah Corporation, ) 13 ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER 14 vs. ) EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S NEVADA CHARTER ACADEMIES d/b/a ) COMPLAINT AMERICAN PREPARATORY ACADEMY– ) LAS VEGAS, a Nevada Corporation, LEE ) (Second Request) IGLODY, an individual, JONATHAN ) GARDNER, an individual, MELISSA ST. ) JEAN, an individual, ERNIE ELLIOT, an ) individual, and CANDYCE FARTHING, an ) individual, RACHELLE HULET, an individual, ) 20 ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) Defendants Nevada Charter Academies dba American Preparatory Academy – Las Vegas, Lee Iglody, Jonathan Gardner, Melissa St. Jean, Ernie Elliott, and Candyce Farthing (“Defendants”) and American Preparatory Schools, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, that Defendants shall have through and including July 29, 2020, within which to file and serve a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1]. This Stipulation is made in accordance with LR IA6-1 and LR 6-2, of the Local Rules of this Court.

Complaint from the original due date of July 16, 2020 3 The Court had earlier granted the parties’ stipulation to an extension of time, up to and including July 27, 2020, for all Defendants (including Defendant Rachelle Hulet) to file their Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 26]. Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1(a), the parties state the reason for the extension requested is that, with the fast moving space of the TRO brefing, counsel for the Defendants need more time to properly respond to the Complaint, and will need additional time of two (2) more days, up to and including July 29, 2020, to prepare responsive pleading.

11 Upon agreement byand between all thepartiesherein, the undersigned respectfully requestthis Court grant another extension of time, up to and including July 29, 2020, for Defendants to file their Answer or otherwiserespond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

15 /// /// /// .// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// The parties have entered into this Stipulation in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

2 DATED this 24" day of July, 2020 DATED this 24"" day of July, 2020.

4 | | 4/Lisa J. Zastrow /s/ Zachary P. Takos [S/ LACNAYY FF, EAKOS ; N pee ZACHARY P. TAKOS, ESQ. evada Bar No. Nevada Bar No. 11293 Noa op 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 300 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, NV 8913> 7 , Att Plainti Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 orneys for Plaintiff || | Attorneys for Defendants Nevada Charter -and- Academies dba American Preparatory | Academy — Las Vegas, Lee Iglody, Jonathan , , PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS + 10 Gardner, Melissa St. Jean, Ernie Elliott, Candyce Farthing JONATHAN O. HAFEN, pro hac vice pending gq ll CHAD S. PEHRSON, pro hac vice pending STEPHEN C. MOURITSEN, pro hac vice oS 12 pending > 13 101 South 200 East, Suite 700 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Zo Attorneys for Plainti 15 ys fe iff a8 16 & 2 ORDER ofr S 19 3 IT ISSO ORDERED.

21 ZRNYX Linney UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: _ July 27, 2020 Page 3 of 3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.