District Court, D. Nevada, 2020

American Preparatory Schools, Inc. v. Nevada Charter Academies

American Preparatory Schools, Inc. v. Nevada Charter Academies
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided August 25, 2020
American Preparatory Schools, Inc. v. Nevada Charter Academies

Trial Court Opinion

1 LJOIPSSEOPNHNP.EGILASROINN,PE.SCQ. .

2 Nevada Bar No. 6653 LISA J. ZASTROW, ESQ.

3 Nevada Bar No. 9727 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, Nevada89144 Phone: (702) 382-1500 Fax: (702)382-1512 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys forDefendantsNevada Charter Academies dba American Preparatory Academy–LasVegas, Lee Iglody, Jonathan Gardner, Melissa St. Jean, Ernie Elliott, Candyce Farthing 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 * * * AMERICAN PREPARATORY SCHOOLS, ) Case No: 2:20-cv-01205-JAD-NJK INC., aUtah Corporation, ) 13 ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER 14 vs. ) EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY ) IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO NEVADA CHARTER ACADEMIES d/b/a ) DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMERICAN PREPARATORY ACADEMY– ) AMENDEDCOMPLAINT LAS VEGAS, a Nevada Corporation, LEE ) IGLODY, an individual, JONATHAN ) (Second Request) GARDNER, an individual, MELISSA ST. ) JEAN, an individual, ERNIE ELLIOT, an ) individual, and CANDYCE FARTHING, an ) 19 ECF No. 46 individual, RACHELLE HULET, an individual, ) 20 ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) Defendants Nevada Charter Academies dba American Preparatory Academy – Las Vegas, Lee Iglody, Jonathan Gardner, Melissa St. Jean, Ernie Elliott, and Candyce Farthing, Defendant Rachelle Hulet (altogether herein referred to as “Defendants”), and American Preparatory Schools, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, that Defendants shall have through and including August 26, 2020, within which to file and serve their Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint [ECF this Court. This is the first request for extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint from the original due date of August 21, 2020.

4 Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1(a), the parties state the reason for the extension requested is that the Defendants’ counsels require additional time to prepare a responsive pleading to the Opposition. [Doc 45] Upon agreement byand between all theparties herein, the undersigned respectfully requestthis Court grant an extension of time, up to and including August 26, 2020, for all Defendants to file their /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ /././ Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. The parties have entered into thi > Stipulation in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

3 || | DATED this 21“ day of August, 2020 DATED this 21“ day of August, 2020.

5 /s/ Lisa J. Zastrow /s/ Zachary P. Takos ¢ || | JOSEPH P. GARIN, ESQ. ZACHARY P. TAKOS, ESQ.

Nr we paste oe 5 Nevada Bar No. 11293 7 . » ESQ. 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 300 Nevada Bar No. 9727 . . . Las Vegas, NV 89135 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Attorneys for Plaintiff Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 || | Attorneys for Defendants Nevada Charter . . -and- 10 Academies dba American Preparatory B Academy — Las Vegas, Lee Iglody, Jonathan PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS 11 Gardner, Melissa St. Jean, Ernie Elliott, 8 D Candyce Farthing JONATHAN O. HAFEN, pro hac vice pending S& . CHAD S. PEHRSON, pro hac vice pending st | DATED day of August, 2020, STEPHEN C. MOURITSEN, pro hac vice 4 pending | | HOGAN HULET 101 South 200 East, Suite 700 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 ®B 15 || | 47 Kenneth E. Hogan “ can ga KENNETH E. HOGAN, ESQ. _.

5 8 ° Att Plaint = 16 Nevada Bar No. 10083 orneys for Plaintiff § = 1140 N. Town Center, Ste. 200 § Las Vegas, NV 89144 £ 18 Attorneys for Defendant Rachelle Hulet ée 3 19 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 i Vv , 24 US. District JudgeJennife (Dorey Dated: August 25, 2020 Page 3 of 3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.