1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 STEPHANIE GORDON, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00139-APG-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER Oy v. [Docket No. 12] 10} STOR UR STUFF, et al., ll Defendant(s). 12 On May 8, 2020, this case was dismissed and closed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Docket Nos. 9-10. The Court indicated that any efforts by Plaintiff to obtain relief on her underlying claims should be conducted in state court. See, e.g., Docket No. 9 at 1. 15 On August 25, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel production of documents. See Docket No. 12 at 2 (‘I am requesting the court to demand Stuff UR Storage provide the 17| documentation for the unit”). As this case has been closed, it is not a proper forum for Plaintiff 18]| to demand document production. 19 Accordingly, the motion to compel is DENIED. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: September 14, 2020 22 7 /- SA Nancy J. Koppe * 23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26

' As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court construes her arguments liberally. See, e.g., 28|| Erickson vy. Pardus,

(2007).