1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 CARY LEE PETERSON Case No. 2:20-cv-00808-RFB-BNW Plaintiff, 8 ORDER v. 9 JOHN DOE 1 et al., 10 Defendant(s).

11

12 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable 13 Brenda Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge, entered July 20, 2020. ECF No. 8. 14 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 15 recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). A party may file specific 16 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed the district court is 18 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 19 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1); see also Local 20 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 21 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 22 Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 23 by August 6, 2020. No timely objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in 24 this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 25 ///// 26

27

28 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [8] is 2 | ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Correction [10] is DENIED 4| ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5 | The Court Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. 6 7 um 8 DATED: September 22, 2020. Md

10 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, IT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-