District Court, D. Nevada, 2020

Hano v. State of Nevada

Hano v. State of Nevada
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided September 25, 2020
Hano v. State of Nevada

Trial Court Opinion

Attorney General HENRY H. KIM (Bar No. 14390) Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 486-3095 (phone) (702) 486-3773 (fax) Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants Gregory Bryan, Cornelius Finley and Jonathan Weber 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA David A. Hano, Case No. 2:19-cv-02246-GMN-EJY 12 Plaintiff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY v. GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA’S MOTION FOR State of Nevada, ex rel Nevada EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A Department of Corrections, et al., NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF 15 SERVICE PURSUANT TO THIS Defendants. COURT’S ORDER (ECF NO. 23) 17 Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada (the Attorney General’s Office) hereby files this Motion for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Acceptance of Service Pursuant to this Court’s Order (ECF No. 23).

20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff David Hano is an inmate in lawful custody of Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) and currently housed at High Desert State Prison (HDSP). Hano has submitted a § 1983 civil rights action against NDOC employees. On September 3, 2020, this Court issued Screening Order on First Amended Complaint (Screening Order) (ECF No. 23). In the Screening Order, this Court ordered the Attorney General’s Office to file a notice of acceptance of service within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the Screening Order, on or before September 24, 2020. ECF No. 23 at 23:1-10.

28 /// make a determination as to whether the Attorney General’s Office will be accepting service on behalf of the newly added defendants in the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 24). In the interest of judicial efficiency, the Attorney General’s Office respectfully requests that this Court grant 14-day extension on the deadline for the Attorney General’s Office to file a notice of acceptance of service.

7 II. APPLICABLE LAW 8 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) governs extensions of time and provides as follows: 10 When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without 11 motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires; or (B) on motion made 12 after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect.

14 Any request to change deadlines established in the scheduling order must be supported by a showing of good cause pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4), which turns primarily on a showing that the deadlines currently in place could not reasonably be met despite the diligent of the movant. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992).

19 III. ARGUMENT 20 Due to an unforeseen calendaring error, The Attorney General’s Office was unable to make a determination as to whether the Attorney General’s Office will be accepting service on behalf of the newly added defendants in the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 24). There is good cause to extend the deadline, because this Court’s process for the Attorney General’s Office to accept service for named defendants is in the interest of judicial efficiency. The process ensures that this Court does not expand unnecessary judicial resources to served the defendants when the Attorney General’s Office accepts service on the defendants’ behalf. Accordingly, the Attorney General’s Office respectfully ||requests that this Court grant an extension on the deadline for the Attorney General’s || Office to accept service and file a notice to this Court regarding the same.

3 CONCLUSION 4 For the foregoing reasons, the Attorney General’s Office respectfully requests that ||this Court grant a 14-day extension on the deadline for the Attorney General’s Office to || accept service on behalf of the defendants named in the First Amended Complaint (ECF || No. 24) or file under seal their last known address. The new deadline would be October 8, || 2020.

9 DATED this 24th day of September, 2020.

10 AARON D. FORD Attorney General By: __/s/ Henry H. Kim 12 HENRY H. KIM (Bar No. 14390) Deputy Attorney General 13 Attorneys for Defendants 15 .

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Office of the 16 Attorney General of the State of Nevada's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Acceptance of 17 Service Pursuant to this Court's Order (ECF No. 26) is 18 GRANTED.

19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General's Office shall have through October 8, 2020 to respond 20 to the Court's September 3, 2020 Order (ECF No. 23).

22 p \ auc) |. Aruchat 23 UNITED STATES (AGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: September 25, 2020

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.