JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Case No. 2:17-cv-0330-RFB-VCF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 vs. 10 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a 11 Nevada limited liability company; TUSCALANTE HOMEOWNERS’ 12 ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit 13 corporation; and TERRY L. CHRISTOPHER, 14 Defendants. 15 ___________________________________ SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada 16 limited liability company, 17 Counter-/Cross- Claimant, 18 vs. 19 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; 20 SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN 21 DEVELOPMENT, a government agency; and TERRY L. CHRISTOPHER, an individual, 22 Counter-/Cross- Defendants. 23 24 I. INTRODUCTION 25 Before the Court is Cross-Claimant SFR Investments’ Motion for Default Judgement 26 against Terry L. Christopher. ECF No. 92. Christopher has not responded to this Motion and has 27 28 / / / 1 | not appeared in this litigation despite having been served. The Clerk of Court entered a default 2 against Christopher on January 17, 2018. ECF No. 71. 3 4 II. DISCUSSION 5 The Court finds that a default judgment should issue int his case. The facts as alleged in 6| the complaint shall be taken as true, since a default has been entered in this case. Garamendi v. 7 Henin,

683 F.3d 1069, 1080

(9th Cir. 2012). In determining whether to grant a motion for a default 8 judgment, courts must consider the factors set forth in Eitel v. McCool,

782 F.2d 1470

, 1471-72 9 10 (9th Cir. 1986). The Court has reviewed the record in this case and agrees with the arguments of 11 | SFR as to the application of the factors to this case. These factors support the issuance of a default 12 | judgment against Christopher. 13 4 The Court further finds, pursuant to the Local Rules, that Christopher has consented to the

15 granting of the Motion by not responding to the Motion. LR 7-2. 16 III. | CONCLUSION 17 IT IS ORDERED that Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool’s Motion for Default 18 19 Judgment [ECF No. 92] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly 20 | and close this case. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DECLARED that Terry L. Christopher has no 22 right, title, or interest in the property located at 7505 Glowing Moon Court, Las Vegas, Nevada 23 89178; Parcel No. 176-27-312-127. 24 25 DATED: September 30, 2020. 26 CNS 27 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown