McCall v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3} } DARIUS MCCALL, Case No.: 2:18-cv-01319-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Granting Motion for Good Faith Settlement v. [ECF No. 83] LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants 9 Defendant Drock Gaming, LLC moves for a determination that its settlement with plaintiff Darius McCall was made in good faith under Nevada Revised Statute § 17.245. ECF 11|| No. 83. No opposition has been filed, so I presume the other parties consent to the granting of 12|| the motion. See Local Rule 7-2(d). In addition, the motion is supported by the factors set forth in re MGM Grand Hotel Fire Litig., 570 F. Supp. 913, 927 (D. Nev. 1983) (“Factors to be 14|| considered by the Court in assessing whether a settlement is in good faith [are] the amount paid 15|| in settlement, the allocation of the settlement proceeds among plaintiffs, the insurance policy 16|| limits of settling defendants, the financial condition of settling defendants, and the existence of 17|| collusion, fraud or tortious conduct aimed to injure the interests of non-settling defendants.”). I 18|| find the parties reached their settlement in good faith and defendant Drock Gaming, LLC is entitled to the protections of Nevada Revised Statute § 17.245.

20 I THEREFORE ORDER that the motion for good faith settlement (ECF NO. 83) is GRANTED.

22 DATED this 2nd day of October, 2020.

23 a a OOS □□ ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE