Bradley v. MGM Resorts

District Court, D. Nevada

Bradley v. MGM Resorts

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 2:19-cv-0922-JAD-BNW Carl Von Bradley, 5 we Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 and Dismissing Action v. 7 MGM Resorts, 8 [ECF No. 13] 9 Defendant 10 1] When plaintiff Carl Von Bradley’s mail from the court began to be returned to sender an: 12 || with the designation “deceased,” the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation for 13 || this court to dismiss and close this action.! The deadline for any party to object to that 14 || recommendation was October 19, 2020, and no party filed anything. “[N]o review is required of 15 magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”” Having reviewed 16 ||the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 18 |] Recommendation [ECF No. 13] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED, and 19 || the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 20 To Te Te U.S. District Judgé JennifésA. Dorsey 21 Dated: October 21, 2020 22 23 24 || 25!!! ECF No. 13. 26 ||> Schmidt v. Johnstone,

263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas vy. Arn, 47 97 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003). 28

Reference

Status
Unknown