1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA BRANDIN LEE JOHNSON, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00776-APG-VCF 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 7] STEVEN ROSE, 7 Defendant 8 On September 29, 2020, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Brandin Lee Johnson did not pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis application and because Johnson has not maintained a current address with the court. Johnson did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 13}| determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14|| made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is accepted. Plaintiff Brandin Lee Johnson’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is 191} DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 26th day of October, 2020. 21 OIE ANDREWP.GORDON. SS 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE