Griffiths v. Monsanto Company

District Court, D. Nevada

Griffiths v. Monsanto Company

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —241)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1407

. See

214 F.Supp.3d 1346

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,105 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

28 U.S.C. § 1407

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

□ FOR THE PANEL: Inasmuch as no objection is cowie ited time, the : VL Z eC Oct 28, 2020 CLERK’S OFFICE John W. Nichols □□□ Cleik ofthe Panel | hereby certify that the annexed instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

aia: 10/38/3020

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−241 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 20−00795 Gilberg et al v. Monsanto Company MINNESOTA MN 0 20−02182 Fridgen v. Monsanto Company MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 20−01467 Cudaback et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 20−01469 Brammer v. Monsanto Company NEVADA NV 2 20−01917 Griffiths v. Monsanto Company NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN NCE 4 20−00187 Leonard et al v. Monsanto Company PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN PAE 2 20−04910 Hernandez v. MONSANTO COMPANY PUERTO RICO PR 3 20−01526 Pagan Resto v. Monsanto Company TENNESSEE MIDDLE TNM 3 20−00875 Redmond et al v. Monsanto Company

Reference

Status
Unknown