1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 Case No.: 2:19-cv-0951-JAD-EJY 4 Roy El,

5 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation 6 and Dismissing Action v. 7 City of Las Vegas Detention Center, 8 [ECF No. 13]

9 Defendant 10 11 Pro se plaintiff Roy El brings this action regarding his 2018 arrest and pretrial 12 confinement. El’s original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend and instructions for 13 curing the defects.1 El filed an amended complaint, and the magistrate judge reviewed it.2 The 14 magistrate judge opines that El still fails to state a viable claim and notes that he “has now 15 submitted documentation that belies the ability to amend his complaint a third time to state 16 viable . . . claims.”3 So she recommends that I dismiss this case with prejudice because 17 amendment would be futile.4 The deadline for El to object to that recommendation was 18 November 4, 2020, and he filed no objection or request to extend that deadline. “[N]o review is 19 required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”5 20 Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 21 22 1 ECF No. 6. 23 2 ECF No. 12. 24 3 ECF No. 13 at 4. 25 4 Id. 26 27 5 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003). 28 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 2 || Recommendation [ECF No. 13] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED with 3 || prejudice for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 4 5 coe Dorsey 6 Dated: November 9, 2020 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

28