Czudar v. Pro-Vigil, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JULIUS CZUDAR, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01784-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9} v. 10) PRO-VIGIL, INC. [Docket No. 35] ll Defendant(s).

12 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend discovery deadlines. Docket 13] No. 35. A request to extend deadlines in the Court’s scheduling order must be supported by a 14] showing of good cause for the extension. Local Rule 26-3; see also Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d at 608-09.' A request to extend deadlines must also provide “[a] 16] specific description of the discovery that remains to be completed.” Local Rule 26-3(b).

17 Here, the parties fail to provide a specific description of the discovery that remains to be 18] completed. See Docket No. 35 at 3. Further, the stipulation requests a 90-day extension in some 19]| sections and a 120-day extension in others. Compare id. at 1, 2, with id. at 3.

20 Accordingly, the Court DENIES the parties’ stipulation without prejudice. Docket No. 35.

22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated: November 19, 2020 24 i K\ BE _ Nancy J. Koppe | 25 United States Magistrate Judge ' The “good cause” standard in Local Rule 26-3 is the same as the standard governing 28]| modification of the scheduling order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b).