1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** RONALD ALLISON, 4 Plaintiff, 5 2:20-cv-01810-APG-VCF vs. ORDER 6 CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 Before the Court is Ronald Allison v. Clark County District Attorney’s Office, et al., case number 9 2:20-cv-01810-APG-VCF. 10 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3 governs commencing an action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 3. “A civil 11 action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.” Id. A complaint must contain the following: 12 (1) a statement of the grounds for jurisdiction, (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing why 13 the Plaintiff is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). 14 Under

(a), a filing fee is required to commence a civil action in federal court. 15 Here, Plaintiff has not complied with Rule 3. No complaint commencing this action has been filed. 16 The filing fee has not been paid. Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee for each case that he seeks to open 17 or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 18 Accordingly, 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff has until December 22, 2020 to file a complaint with an 20 accompanying filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order 21 may result in dismissal of this case. 22

23 NOTICE 24 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 25 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal

> {| may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 3 time. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections 4 || within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the 5 to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. 6 || Martinez v. YIst,

(9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist.,

, T 1) 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 8 Pursuant to Local Special Rule 2-2, the Plaintiff must immediately file written notification with ° the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party of the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this Rule may result in dismissal of the action. See LSR 2-2. 12 13 DATED this 2nd day of December, 2020. a pagel capettith gee □□□ 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25