Martin v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case No.: 2:20-cv-02041-JAD-DJA Shajuando Martin, we Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio and Dismissing Action v. Commissioner of Social Security,

[ECF No. 5] Defendant

1] On November 9, 2020, the magistrate judge dismissed the plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend, warning the plaintiff that the failure to file an amended complaint by December

2020, would result in a recommendation for this court to dismiss this action.! When the plaintiff filed nothing by that deadline, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation that this case be dismissed.” The deadline for the plaintiff to object to that recommendation was December 28, 2020, and the plaintiff neither filed objections nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

SME Ak =

U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey 9A Dated: January 5, 2021

ECF No. 3.

97 ||? ECF No. 5.

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 47

140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).