Curtis v. Harbor Island Apts

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA THOMAS W. CURTIS, Case No.: 2:20-cv-02066-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing SH v. Complaint with Prejudice HARBOR ISLAND APTS, [ECF No. 3] 7 Defendant 8 On December 16, 2020, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Thomas Curtis’s complaint with prejudice because the complaint is frivolous and delusional.

ECF No. 3. Curtis did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 15}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 3) is accepted, plaintiff Thomas Curtis’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED 18} with prejudice, and plaintiff Thomas Curtis’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 19|| (ECF No. 1) is DENIED as moot. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly 20]| and to close this case.

21 DATED this 6th day of January, 2021.

22 OIE.

3 ANDREWP.GORDON. SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE