Christensen v. Nguyen

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

COREY D. CHRISTENSEN, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01770-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and

Recommendation and Dismissing Case SH v. Without Prejudice

ROCHELLE T. NGUYEN and MATTHEW [ECF No. 8] LAY,

Defendants On December 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Corey Christensen did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF No. 8. Christensen did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation (ECF No. 8) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 6th day of January, 2021.

21 ( Zoe

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE