Fletcher v. Dzurenda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

BILLY FLETCHER, Case No. 2:18-cv-01077-RFB-VCF Plaintiff,

ORDER v.

DZURENDA, et al.,

Defendant.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 49] of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered October 15, 2020.

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by October 29, 2020. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. . . .

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 49] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

ITS IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 29] is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs case is dismissed without prejudice and this case closed.

The Court Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff.

DATED: January 14, 2021.

RICH QD F.PODHware, II ll United StateSDtstrict Judge

_2-