1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7| DEVOPS SHERPAS, LLC, Case No.: 2:20-cv-02108-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order Oy v. 10]| PROJECT CIRCLE, LTD., et al., ll Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is a joint status report seeking a stay of discovery pending 13] resolution of a motion to dismiss. Docket No. 22. To the extent the parties seek a stay of discovery, a request must be filed identifying the governing standards and providing meaningful explanation as to how they are met. See, e.g., Kor Media Grp., LLC v. Green,

(D. Nev. 16] 2013). Either a well-developed request for a stay of discovery or a proposed discovery plan must 17|| be filed by February 23, 2021. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: February 16, 2021 ee. Nancy J. Koppe, \. 21 United States Wiagistrate Judge 22 23 24

' The status report indicates that the motion to dismiss is not potentially case-dispositive, 26] Docket No. 22 at 2 (indicating that breach of contract claim will remain), but no explanation is provided as to why a case-wide stay of discovery is appropriate given the limited scope of the 27|| underlying motion practice, cf, Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.,

(D. Nev. 2011) (“the pending motion must be potentially dispositive of the entire case or at least dispositive on 28] the issue on which discovery is sought”).