Wait v. Holm

District Court, D. Nevada

Wait v. Holm

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 DUKE WAIT, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:18-cv-02038-GMN-VCF 5 vs. ) 6 ) ORDER D. HOLM SENIOR, D. BROWN, JOHN DOE ) 7 OFFICER, et al., ) ) 8 Defendants. ) ) 9 10 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States 11 Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, (ECF No. 34), which recommends that this case be 12 dismissed for failure to comply with Local Rule IA 3-1 and with Court Order, (ECF No. 32). 13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 14 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B); 15 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 16 determination of those portions to which objections are made.

Id.

The Court may accept, reject, 17 or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 18

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court 19 is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an 20 objection.” Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized 21 that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 22 where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114

, 23 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 24 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so, March 26, 2021, has passed. 25 (See Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 34). 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 34), is 3 ADOPTED in full. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF 6 No. 28), is DENIED as moot. 7 The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. 8 DATED this _2_9__ day of March, 2021. 9 10 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge 11 United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Reference

Status
Unknown