Stanley v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Stanley v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA DONAVE STANLEY, Case No.: 2:20-cv-02358-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motion to v. Amend G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., [ECF Nos. 15, 18] 7 Defendant 8 On March 15, 2021, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I deny plaintiff Donave Stanley’s motion to amend. ECF No. 18. Stanley did not file an objection. Thus, I am 10} not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 12}|report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna- 13}| Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 14] magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 15} otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. is accepted and plaintiff Donave Stanley’s motion to amend (ECF No. 15) is DENIED. 18 DATED this 31st day of March, 2021. 19 ZL 0 ANDREWP.GORDON SS 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22 23

Reference

Status
Unknown