District Court, D. Nevada, 2021

Price v. Allied Universal Protection

Price v. Allied Universal Protection
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided April 5, 2021
Price v. Allied Universal Protection

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA LEONA PRICE, )

) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:19-cv-00895-GMN-EJY vs. )

) ORDER

ALLIED UNIVERSAL PROTECTION, )

) Defendant. )

) Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah, (ECF No. 15), which recommends that Plaintiff’s documents, (ECF Nos. 11, 12, and 14), be dismissed with prejudice as they fail to state any cognizable claim and, as such, the Court cannot envision any amendment that would provide an essential element of the claim absent from these filings.

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. Local R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. Local R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See Min. Order, ECF No. 15) (setting a September 30, 2020 deadline for objections).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 15), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 11), Supplement, (ECF No. 12), and Second Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 14) are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. DATED this ___5___ day of April, 2021.

___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.