1

2

3

4

5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8 * * *

9 ROBERT LEE MITCHELL, JR., Case No. 3:21-cv-00086-HDM-CLB

10 Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 Robert Lee Mitchell, Jr. has submitted what he has styled as a pro se petition for 15 illegal sentence. His application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The court has 16 reviewed the petition pursuant to Habeas Rule 4 and finds that it must be dismissed for 17 failure to state a claim cognizable in federal habeas corpus. 18 This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person 19 in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in 20 custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28

(a). Alleged errors in the interpretation or application of state law do not 22 warrant habeas relief. Hubbart v. Knapp,

(9th Cir. 2004). 23 Here, Mitchell claims he is entitled to immediate release. The basis of this claim 24 is unclear; he states only that “the Nevada Department of Corrections has a 99-year 25 lease to occupy lands, which does not convert the land to state jurisdiction. . . . the NRS 26 statutes are not really positive true law.” (ECF No. 1). These are frivolous allegations 27 that do not state a claim for which federal habeas corpus relief may be granted. The court further notes that, while Mitchell names the President of the United States and the ' Secretary of the Interior as respondents, the proper respondent for a § 2254 habeas 2 corpus petition is the state official who has custody of the petitioner (generally the warden of the institution where petitioner is held). Rule 2(b) of the Rules Governing 4 Section 2254 Cases. In any event, this petition is dismissed for failure to state a claim cognizable in federal habeas corpus. 6 The court will not issue a certificate of appealability, as reasonable jurists would not debate the dismissal of this petition. 8 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s application to proceed in forma 9 pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. "0 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is dismissed for failure to state a " claim cognizable in federal habeas corpus. "2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment accordingly and close " this case. 15 16 DATED: 7 April 2021. ual” S ttt fMM> HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN 19 UITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28