District Court, D. Nevada, 2021

Gelizon v. Green Dot Corporation

Gelizon v. Green Dot Corporation
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided April 20, 2021
Gelizon v. Green Dot Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

Jordan T. Smith, Esq., Bar No. 4027

[email protected]

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

400 South 7th Street, Suite 300

Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

Telephone: 702.214.2100

Facsimile: 702.214.2101

Lauri A. Mazzuchetti, Esq. (pro hac vice to be submitted)

[email protected]

Whitney M. Smith, Esq. (pro hac vice to be submitted)

[email protected]

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP

One Jefferson Road, Second Floor

Parsippany, NJ 07054

Attorneys for Defendant Green Dot Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

JAY GELIZON, individually and on behalf of CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-00335-RFB-BNW all others similarly situated,

CLASS ACTION

Plaintiff, v.

GREEN DOT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME SECOND REQUEST

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff Jay Gelizon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated ("Plaintiff") and Green Dot Corporation ("Defendant"), subject to the approval of the Court, that the time for Green Dot to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended from the current April 23, 2021 deadline to May 10, 2021 in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163 27 (2021), issued on April 1, 2021. 1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint on February 26, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) 2. Defendant’s original deadline to respond to the Complaint was March 24, 2021 However, the parties stipulated to an extension of time to April 23, 2021 to allow Defendan additional time to investigate the Complaint’s allegations. (ECF No. 6.)

3. In the meantime, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Facebook, Inc. \ Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163 (2021), which addresses provisions of the Telephone Consume Protection Act upon which Plaintiff relies as the basis of his claim in this action. 4. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have up to an including May 10, 2021 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 5. This is the second extension of this deadline. The parties have entered thi stipulation in good faith and it is not meant for purposes of delay.

Submitted this 14th day of April, 2021 Submitted this 14th day of April, 2021 KIND LAW PISANELLI BICE PLLC By: __/s/ Michael Kind By: __/s/ Jordan T. Smith 15 Michael Kind, Esq., #13903 Jordan T. Smith, Esq., #12097 8860 S. Maryland Parkway, Suite 106 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 and

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP George Haines, Esq., #9411

Gerardo Avalos, Esq., #15171

FREEDOM LAW FIRM By: _ /s/Lauri A. Mazzuchetti 8985 S. Eastern Avenue., Suite 350 Lauri A. Mazzuchetti, Esq. Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 One Jefferson Road, Second Floor Parsippany, NJ 07054 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jay Gelizon

Attorneys for Defendant Green Dot Corporation

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. qm be We beta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE April 20, 2021 DATED:

CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-00335-RFB-BNW

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.