McDonald v. Prater

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * CHARLES E. MCDONALD, JR., Case No. 2:19-cv-00192-RFB-EJY 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. D. PRATER, et al., 11 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) of the Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 26, 2021.

II. BACKGROUND On July 21, 2020, when Plaintiff was incarcerated, the Court issued its Screening Order granting Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, ordered a 90 day stay for parties to resolve the dispute, and referred the matter to the Court’s Inmate Early Mediation (“IEM”) Program. ECF No. 10. On October 27, 2020, the Court learned that Plaintiff was no longer incarcerated and so vacated the IEM, ordered the stay to remain operative through the IEM date, and directed Plaintiff to file “written notification of his email address and telephone number on or before November 25, 2020.” ECF No. 17 at 1.

On November 30, 2020, the Court issued an Order advising Plaintiff about the requirements of Local Rule 1A 3-1: Change of Contact Information. ECF No. 19. The Court stated that Plaintiff must comply with Local Rule 1A 3-1 by December 30, 2020 or the Court shall issue an Order to Show Cause why Plaintiff should not be sanctioned for contempt of court.

1 On January 26, 2021, the Order issued an Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiff to show cause no later than February 16, 2021 about why Plaintiff should not be sanctioned for contempt of court and why the matter should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s order.

4 ECF No. 21. Plaintiff failed to respond.

5 On February 26, 2021, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Youchah issued this instant Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s action be dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 26.

8 On March 24, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address. ECF No. 23. He requested an extension to reply to the Motion to Show Cause, explaining that as a pro se litigant, he is not familiar with the law, he did not receive any letters or actions from the court, and the courts were closed due to COVID-19.

13 III. DISCUSSION 14 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 17 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

22 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by March 12, 2021.

24 Plaintiff’s Notice of Change of Address was not fully compliant with Local Rule 1A 3-1 and the Court’s Orders. ECF No. 23. The filing included Plaintiff’s mailing address, but did not include an email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. It also did not include proof of service on each opposing party or the party’s attorney.

28 The Court again advises Plaintiff that pursuant to Local Rule 1A 3-1, Plaintiff must file with the court written notification of his mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. The notice must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party’s | attorney. If Plaintiff does not have an email address, telephone number, or facsimile number, Plaintiff must state so in his filing.

6 IV. CONCLUSION 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 22] is | DENIED.

9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file an amended Notice of Change of | Address by Friday, June 4, 2021. Failure to do so may result Plaintiff's action being dismissed | without prejudice.

14 1< 15 DATED: May 18, 2021. INS 16 RICHARD F“BOULWARE, II 17 United States District Judge -3-