Kido v. Independent American Insurance Compoany

District Court, D. Nevada

Kido v. Independent American Insurance Compoany

Trial Court Opinion

1 ROBERT S. LARSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7785 2 DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13285 3 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 300 So. 4th Street, Suite 1550 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 577-9300 5 Direct: (702) 577-9301 Facsimile: (702) 255-2858 6 E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] 7 Attorneys for Defendants Independence 8 American Insurance Company; Independence Holding Company; IHC Specialty Benefits, Inc.; 9 and The Loomis Company

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 Joel David Kido, 14 Case No.: 2:21-cv-00678-APG-BNW Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO vs. EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN 16 SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS Independence American Insurance Company, 17 a Delaware corporation; Independence (First Request) Holding Company, a Delaware corporation;

18 IHC Specialty Benefits, Inc., a Delaware corporation; The Loomis Company, a 19 Delaware corporation; Elixir Savings, LLC, fka Envision Medical Solutions, LLC, dba, 20 EnvisionSavings; and United Services Automobile Association; and Does 2 through 21 20, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 24 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1, Defendants Independence American Insurance Company 25 (“IAIC”), Independence Holding Company (“IHC”), IHC Specialty Benefits (“IHC SB”), and 26 The Loomis Company (“Loomis”) (collectively, “Insurance Defendants”), by and through their 27 attorneys, Robert S. Larsen, Esq. and Dione C. Wrenn, Esq. of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, 1 Whitehead, Esq. of Whitehead & Whitehead, Ltd., hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 2 1. Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada 3 on March 17, 2021. 4 2. Defendants IAIC and Loomis removed the case to this Court on April 23, 2021. 5 3. Insurance Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on April 30, 6 2021. 7 4. Plaintiff filed a Response to the Insurance Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on May 14, 8 2021. 9 5. The current deadline for the Insurance Defendants to reply to Plaintiff’s Response is 10 May 21, 2021. 11 6. Insurance Defendants requested additional time to file their Reply up to and including 12 May 25, 2021. 13 7. Plaintiff does not oppose Insurance Defendants’ requested extension. 14 8. Accordingly Insurance Defendants will file their Reply in support of their Motion to 15 Dismiss on May 25, 2021. 16 9. This stipulation is not made for the purposes of delay. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 || DATED this 21st day of May 2021. DATED this 21st day of May 2021. 3 GORDON REES SCULLY WHITEHEAD & WHITEHEAD, LTD. 4 MANSUKHANI 5 || Dione C. Wrenn /s/ Jonathan Whitehead ROBERT S. LARSEN, ESQ. JONATHAN WHITEHEAD, ESQ. © || Nevada Bar No. 7785 Nevada Bar No. 4415 Nevada Bar No. 13285 Reno, Nevada 89521 evaca a 0. . Attorney for Plaintiff, 8 ||

300 South 4

" Street, Suite 1550 Joel David Kido Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 9 || Attorneys for Defendants Independence 10 American Insurance Company; Independence Holding Company; IHC 11 || Specialty Benefits, Inc.; and The Loomis Company

13

IT IS SO ORDERED. 4% 16 so 17 |, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 DATED: May 21, 2021

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown