Severns v. State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada

Severns v. State of Nevada

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 3:20-cv-00407-MMD-WGC MARK SEVERNS, 4 Order Plaintiff 5 Re: ECF No. 1-2 v. 6 STATE OF NEVADA, et. al., 7 Defendants 8

9 10 Plaintiff, through his inmate assistant Kentrell Welch, has filed a motion for appointment 11 of counsel. (ECF No. 1-2.) The motion states that Plaintiff is illiterate, has been adjudicated 12 incompetent due to brain injuries and suffers from mental cognizance disabilities that curb his 13 ability to read, write, articulate or communicate his thoughts past a grade school child's level. 14 (ECF No. 1-2.) 15 District Judge Du issued a screening order that, among other things, dismissed the 16 complaint with leave to amend, making any amended complaint due within 30 days of the date 17 of entry of a decision on Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 10.) 18 Generally, a person has no right to counsel in civil actions.” Palmer v. Valdez,

560 F.3d 19 965, 970

(9th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted); see also United States v. $292,888.04,

54 F.3d 564

, 569 20 (9th Cir. 1995).

28 U.S.C. § 1915

, however, governs in forma pauperis proceedings and provides 21 that the court may request an attorney to represent a person who cannot afford counsel. 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915(e)(1). Such an appointment is within the court’s discretion, and should only be done when 23 “exceptional circumstances” are present. Palmer,

560 F.3d at 970

(citation omitted); Agyeman v. 1 Corrs. Corp. of Am.,

390 F.3d 1101

, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789

2 F.2d 1328

, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)). In determining whether these circumstances exist, “a court must 3 consider ‘the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate 4 his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.’” Palmer,

560 F.3d at 970

5 (quoting Weygandt v. Look,

718 F.2d 952, 954

(9th Cir 1983)); Agyeman, 390 F.3d at 1103. 6 “Neither of these considerations is dispositive and instead must be viewed together.” Palmer, 560 7 F.3d at 970 (citation omitted). 8 Within 14 days of the date of this Order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice 9 with the court indicating whether it will enter a limited appearance for the purpose of responding 10 to Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. No defenses or objections, including lack of 11 service, will be waived as a result of the filing of the limited notice of appearance. If a limited 12 appearance is entered, then within 21 days of the date of this Order, the Attorney General's 13 Office shall file a response to the motion for appointment of counsel along with the relevant 14 medical/mental health and other records (i.e., if there are criminal case records concerning

15 Plaintiff's competency), and if appropriate, a declaration from a person from the Nevada 16 Department of Corrections (NDOC) with knowledge of Plaintiff's medical/mental health 17 condition (the records may be filed under seal). The court will then set this matter for a 18 telephonic hearing. 19 20 21 22 23 /// 1 The Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this Order as well as a copy of Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2) and the screening order (ECF No. 3] 10) on the Nevada Attorney General's Office by adding the Nevada Attorney General's Office to the docket sheet. This will not constitute a general appearance. IS SO ORDERED. 6|| Dated: May 24, 2021 [Jat 6. Cobb William G. Cobb 8 United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Reference

Status
Unknown