Bishop v. The Vons Companies, Inc.

1 SODW LEW BRANDON, JR., ESQ.

2 Nevada Bar No. 5880 ANDREW GUZIK, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 12758 || HOMERO GONZALEZ, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 15231 BRANDON | SMERBER LAW FIRM + 6 139 East Warm Springs Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 (702) 380-0007 = (702) 380-2964— facsimile Sau 8 || [email protected] = 9 «|| @[email protected] = 2 3 [email protected] = % 10 || Attorneys for Defendant, THE VONS COMPANIES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA = JAN E. BISHOP, individually, cr] iE Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 2:19-cv-02029-RFB-BNW > =. 16 VS. & — 17 || THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., a 7, Nevada Foreign Corporation; DOE 4 18 || MANAGER; DOES I through XX; and 19 ROE CORPORATIONS I through XX; inclusive, Defendants.

22 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT, THE VONS COMPANIE INC., WITH PREJUDICE LEAVING NO REMAINING PARTIES 34 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED TO by LEW BRANDON, JR., ES' || ANDREW GUZIK, ESQ., and HOMERO GONZALEZ, ESQ., of BRANDON | SMERB!

26 || LAW FIRM, on behalf of Defendant, THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., and Plaintiff, JAN || BISHOP, by and through GLENN A. PATERNOSTER, ESQ., and POOJA KUMAR, ESQ., PATERNOSTER LAW GROUP, LLC, as follows: Jan E. Bishop v The Vons Companies, Inc., et 5 Case No. 2:19-cv-02029-RFB-BN 3 That Defendant, THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., be dismissed, with prejudice from 1 4 above-entitled matter, leaving no remaining parties. Each party to bear their own fees and cos 2 DATED this Wik day of June, 2021. DATED this Way of June, 2021.

BRANDON | SMERBER LAW PATERNOSTER LAW GROUP a 7 FIBA n ‘ oe aK Ox, 6 Ul /s/aevt-Brandan, Jr. Esq. CARY A 2A i Mh WSATD = LEW BRANDON, JR., ESQ. GLENN A. PATERNOSTER, ESQ. < 10 Nevada Bar No. 5880 Nevada Bar No. 5452 ANDREW GUZIK, ESQ. POOJA KUMAR, ESQ.

11 || Nevada Bar No. 12758 Nevada Bar No. 12988 D HOMERO GONZALEZ, ESQ. 400 South 4" Street, Suite 300 Nevada Bar No. 15231 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 13 139 East Warm Springs 702-654-1111 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Facsimile — 702-522-1522 14 (702) 380-0007 [email protected] (702) 380-2964— facsimile [email protected] lL [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff, > => 16 [email protected] JAN E. BISHOP [email protected] —F 17 Attorneys for Defendant, 7, 7 THE VONS COMPANIES, INC. O- 19 M/ 20 □□ at il HI HI 26 // Wi 1 Jan E. Bishop v The Vons Companies, Inc., et Case No. 2:19-cv-02029-RFB-Bi 3 IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant, THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., be dismiss with prejudice from the above-entitled matter, leaving no remaining parties. Each party to b > || their own fees and costs. = 6 a 3 a DATED this 4th dayof _ June , 2021.

S82 10 RICHA LWARE, I United States District Court = 12 : Respectfully submitted by: BRANDON | SMERBER LAW FIRM /s/ A Brandon, Jr., Esq. —? = = 16 || LEW BRANDON, JR., ESQ.

NT & Nevada Bar No. 5880 —' 17 || ANDREW GUZIK, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 12758 || HOMERO GONZALEZ, ESQ.

19 || Nevada Bar No. 15231 East Warm Springs || Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 (702) 380-0007 |! (702) 380-2964~ facsimile ro 9) || [email protected] a.guzik(@bsnv.law || [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant, || THE VONS COMPANIES, INC.