Campagna v. Arroweye Solutions, Inc.

1 ROBERT S. LARSEN, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 7785 DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 13285 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 300 South 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 577-9300 Direct Line: (702) 577-9304 Facsimile: (702) 255-2858 E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants, Arroweye Solutions, Inc., Gina Ciampaglio, And Mica Moseley UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JENNIFER CAMPAGNA, an individual, ) Case No.: 2:21-cv-00581-JCM-VCF ) 14 Plaintiff, ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 15 vs. ) EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLIES ) IN SUPPORT OF: ARROWEYE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware ) (1) DEFENDANT GINA corporation; GINA CIAMPAGLIO, an individual; ) CIAMPAGLIO’ S MOTION TO MICA MOSELEY, an individual; DOES I through ) DISMISS [ECF No. 9] ; X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES, I ) (2) DEFENDANT MICA through X, inclusive, ) MOSELEY’S MOTION TO DISMISS ) [ECF No. 10]; and 19 Defendants. ) (3) DEFENDANT ARROWEYE ) SOLUTIONS, INC.’S MOTION TO 20 ) DISMISS [ECF No. 12] ) 21 ) (First Request) ) 22 ) 23 Plaintiff Jennifer Campagna (“Plaintiff”), by and through her attorney Jill Garcia of H1 Law Group, and Defendants Arroweye Solutions, Inc., Gina Ciampaglio and Mica Moseley (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys, Robert S. Larsen and Dione C. Wrenn of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 27 1. Defendants each filed a separate Motion to Dismiss Complaint on May 7, 2021 1 2. Plaintiffs filed separate Responses in Opposition to each of the respective || Defendants’ Motions on May 28, 2021 (“Oppositions”) (ECF Nos. 17, 18 and 19).

3 3. The current deadline for Defendants to file their Replies in Support of said Motions || (hereafter, “Replies’”) is June 3, 2021.

5 4. Defendants request additional time to file their Replies to said Motions up to and || including June 11, 2021.

7 5. This is Defendants’ first request for extension of the reply deadlines, and it is not || intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

9 6. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants’ requested extensions.

10 7. Accordingly, Defendants will file their Replies in support of said Motions on June |) 11, 2021. ie 12 8. This is the first request for said extension and is not made for purposes of delay.

Sw = 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. || DATED this 4% day of June, 2021, DATED this 4 day of June, 2021.

| || GORDON REES SCULLY H1 LAW GROUP 1 MANSUKHANI as □ || 4/ Dione C. Wrenn /s/ Jill Garcia ROBERT S. LARSEN, ESQ. JILL GARCIA, ESQ.

18 |! Nevada Bar No. 7785 wey Bar NS ee k Suite 200 . Green Valley Parkway, Suite 19 Newt, 5 , es Henderson, Nevada 89074 evada Dar th °. . Attorney for Plaintiff, 20 300 South 4" Street, Suite 1550 Jennifer Campagna Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 21 Attorneys for Defendants, Arroweye Solutions, Inc., Gina Ciampaglio, and || Mica Moseley IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 A a NBA he yO. Atatlan 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 DATED: June 9, 2021 ty