Grant v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No.: 2:20-cv-01629-JAD-NJK Claude Grant, 5 laintiff Plainti Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 and Dismissing Action v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 8 [ECF Nos. 14, 15, 41] 9 Defendant 11 On May 25, 2021, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation for this || court to dismiss and close this action based on the plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders || despite the explicit warning that dismissal could result.! The deadline for any party to object to || that recommendation was June 8, 2020, and no party filed anything. “[N]o review is required of ||a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”* Having reviewed ||the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and || Recommendation [ECF No. 41] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED, all || pending motions [ECF Nos. 14, 15] are DENIED as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to 20 ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. <] a Jees*7 22 USS. District Res Dorsey 23 Dated: June 10, 2021 | 251]! ECF No. 41.
26 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 97 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.