Gubbine v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

SONNY JAMES GUBBINE, Case No. 3:19-cv-00127-MMD-CLB Plaintiff, ORDER v.

RENEE BAKER, et al.,

Defendants.

Pro se Plaintiff Sonny Gubbine filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R” or “Recommendation”) of United States Magistrate Judge Carla L. Baldwin (ECF No. 34), recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 27) be granted. Gubbine had until June 28, 2021, to file an objection. To date, no objection to the R&R has been filed. For this reason, and as explained below, the Court adopts the R&R, and will grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party fails to object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2003) (“De novo review of the magistrate judges’ findings and recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the findings and recommendations.”) (emphasis in original); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory Committee Notes (1983) (providing that the Court “need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”).

Because there is no objection, the Court need not conduct de novo review, and is satisfied Judge Baldwin did not clearly err. Here, Judge Baldwin recommends granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as Defendants have met their initial burden and Gubbine has failed to present or produce evidence that would establish or create an issue of fact regarding his claim that he was served with expired lunch meat. (ECF No. at 5-7.) The Court agrees with Judge Baldwin. Having reviewed the R&R and the record in this case, the Court will adopt the R&R in full.

It is therefore ordered that Judge Baldwin’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 34) is accepted and adopted in full.

It is further ordered that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 27) is granted.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. DATED THIS 6" Day of July 2021. □□ i {Lhe

MIRANDA M. DU

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE