Albanese v. Homeland Security of U.S.

District Court, D. Nevada

Albanese v. Homeland Security of U.S.

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA GRACE A. ALBANESE, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01049-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF Nos. 1, 3] HOMELAND SECURITY OF USS., 7 Defendant 8 On June 8, 2021, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Grace Albanese’s complaint because she has previously been found to be a vexatious litigant but she 10}| failed to obtain leave from the Chief Judge of this court before commencing this case. ECF No. Albanese did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 13} determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation (ECF No. 3) is accepted, plaintiffs complaint (ECF No. 1-2) is DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff filing a complaint in a new action if she first obtains leave to do so from the Chief Judge of this court, and plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is 21]/DENIED as moot. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 22 DATED this 6th day of June, 2021. OIA 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown