City of Las Vegas v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case No.: 2:21-cv-01035-JAD-BNW City of Las Vegas,

Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation and Remanding Case v.

Malcolm Brooks, [ECF No. 3]

Defendant

This municipal-court traffic matter found its way to this court because Malcolm Brooks improperly removed it here, so the magistrate judge recommends that I remand it back to the court it started in.1 The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was July 7, 2021, and no party filed anything. Indeed, Brooks has since filed a notice of withdrawal of his removal notice, asking that this case be returned to its original venue.2 “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”3 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is remanded back to

1 ECF No. 3.

2 ECF No. 4.

3 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 27 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). the Las Vegas Municipal Court, Case No. 1-0602067, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. woos RS, Dorsey Dated: July 12, 2021