Hart v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA SAMUEL HART. Case No. 2:21-cv-0340-JAD-NJK Plaintiff(s), 9 ORDER [Docket No. 24] DEPARTMENT. OMITAN POLICE 12 Defendant(s).

13 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket No. 24. “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey 15] v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 16] 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written 17|| notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case- 18]| dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule JA 3-1.

19 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by August 20|| 4, 2021. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE.

22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated: July 14, 2021 24 7 A = — ~~~, Nancy J. Ko 25 United States Magistrate Judge