Nasby v. Garrett
Trial Court Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 eK OK || BRENDAN NASBY, Case No. 3:07-cv-00304-LRH-WGC 7 Petitioner, v. ORDER 9 E.K. MCDANIEL, et al., 10 Respondents.
12 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s unopposed first || Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 215) is GRANTED.
14 On April 8, 2021, the Court appointed counsel for petitioner (ECF No. 211) after granting || motions to withdraw as counsel (ECF Nos. 208, 209). The Court further ordered the stay and || administrative closure to remain in place for 90 days to allow new counsel time to review the || extensive prior proceedings and claims herein as well as to confer with petitioner. Petitioner || requests a 46-day extension of the stay and administrative closure. The stay and administrative || closure is extended until August 23, 2021. By granting any extension herein, the Court makes no || implied finding or representation as to the timeliness of any claim asserted or to be asserted herein.
21 || See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013).
22 DATED this 26" day of July 2021.
23 - L Y R. HICK 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.