District Court, D. Nevada, 2021

Miyayama v. Hosoda

Miyayama v. Hosoda
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided August 2, 2021
Miyayama v. Hosoda

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * YUICHI MIYAYAMA, an individual, Case No. 2:20-cv-01683-GMN-DJA Plaintiff, 7 ORDER v. STEVEN H. BURKE, et al., Defendants.

11 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 30), filed on July 2, 2021. Any response by Defendants was due by July 16, 2021. No response has been filed to date. Accordingly, Defendants’ failure to file points and authorities in response to the Motion “constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” Local Rule 7-2(d).

15 Further, Plaintiff indicates that he has served his notice of non-opposition (ECF No. 31) on Defendants.

17 Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, regarding the amendment of pleadings, directs that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has repeatedly cautioned courts in this circuit to “liberally allow a party to amend its pleading.” Sonoma Cnty. Ass'n of Ret. Emps. v. Sonoma Cnty., 708 F.3d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 2013). “Courts may decline to grant leave to amend only if there is strong evidence of ‘undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, or futility of amendment, etc.’” Id. at 1117 (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)).

26 Here, Plaintiff represents that the amended complaint replaces a deceased defendant with the executor of the deceased’s estate, that Plaintiff has learned additional facts about Defendants, and that Plaintiff learned of additional defendants. Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint to include these facts and defendants. The Court has reviewed the Motion and finds good cause to permit the amendment.

4 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 30) is granted.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file and serve the amended complaint (ECF No. 30-1) in accordance with Local Rule 15-1.

8 DATED: August 2, 2021.

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.