Jolliff v. Nevada CVS Pharmacy, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8] LORA JOLLIFF, Case No. 2:21-cv-00098-GMN-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10], v. 11} NEVADA CVS PHARMACY LLC, et al., 12 Defendant(s).

13 To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26- 14]| 1(a). The parties are hereby ORDERED to file, no later than August 31, 2021, a joint proposed 15|| discovery plan.' 16 IT IS SO ORDERED.

17 Dated: August 19, 2021 Lo fe” Nancy J. Koppe \.

19 United States Magistrate Judge _____""[{[_ ' The Court recognizes that an order to show cause was issued as to why the case should not be remanded. Docket No. 7. The potential that a case may be remanded is generally not sufficient justification to stay discovery because a remand would not render any discovery conducted in this case moot or otherwise result in a waste of the parties’ resources. Anoruo v. Valley Health Sys., LLC, 2018 WL 1785866, at *3 (D. Nev. Apr. 13, 2018); see also Grammer v. Colo. Hosp. Ass’n Shared Servs., 2015 WL 3938406, at *2 (D. Nev. June 26, 2015 ) (“This action will either continue in federal court or in state court. Unless the case settles, discovery will proceed 27| regardless of the outcome of the District Court’s remand decision”). Nonetheless, to the extent the parties believe justification exists to stay discovery in this case, a request to stay discovery 28] addressing the applicable standards may be filed by August 31, 2021.