Brown v. Krane
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No.: 2:21-cv-00015-JAD-VCF Jacqueline Brown,
Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation and Remanding Case v.
Joan Krane, et al., [ECF No. 3]
Defendants
This case finds its way to federal court because the Plaintiff Jacqueline Brown removed it here from the Las Vegas Justice Court.1 Because federal court is one of limited jurisdiction, and the law does not permit a plaintiff to remove her own state-court case to federal court, the magistrate judge recommends that I remand this case back to its original court.2 The deadline for the plaintiff to object to that recommendation passed with no objection or request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”3 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in full;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this case is REMANDED back to the Las Vegas
See ECF No. 1-1.
2 ECF No. 3.
3 United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Justice Court, Case No. 20E010963. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE THIS CASE. cmon Oe
Dated: September 8, 2021
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.