Swint v. Meyer

District Court, D. Nevada

Swint v. Meyer

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ROBERT JAMES SWINT, Case No.: 2:21-cv-00934-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 5] CHRYSTAL MARIE MEYER, 7 Defendant 8 On July 20, 2021, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Robert Swint’s complaint without prejudice because it appears that Swint has abandoned this case. ECF 5. Swint did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 5) is accepted. Plaintiff Robert Swint’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The 18} clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 13th day of September, 2021. 20 OI a ANDREWP.GORDON. SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23

Reference

Status
Unknown