District Court, D. Nevada, 2021

Peters v. Law Office of Michael A. Troiano

Peters v. Law Office of Michael A. Troiano
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided October 12, 2021
Peters v. Law Office of Michael A. Troiano

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case No.: 2:21-cv-01370-JAD-BNW Kem Peters,

Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation and Dismissing Action v.

Law Office of Michael A. Troiano, et al., [ECF No. 4]

Defendants.

On July 22, 2021, the magistrate judge entered an order requiring the plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee by August 6, 2021. The plaintiff was warned that the failure to file or pay the fee by that deadline would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.1 When the plaintiff filed nothing by that deadline and did not pay the fee, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation (R&R) that this case be dismissed.2 The deadline for the plaintiff to object to that recommendation was October 1, 2021, and the plaintiff neither filed objections nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”3 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.

1 ECF No. 3.

ECF No. 4.

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 28 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). ] IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. ‘ LYNYY, woman Sims

Dated: October 12, 2021

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.