Duarte v. Williams
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Pedro R. Duarte, Case No.: 2:12-cv-01305-JAD-EJY Petitioner
Order Granting Conditional Writ of v. Habeas Corpus on Remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Brian Williams, et al., Ninth Circuit
Respondents [ECF No. 96.]
Petitioner Pedro R. Duarte sought a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 based, in part, on claims that his trial counsel was ineffective.1 I denied Duarte’s petition, and this case was closed on September 30, 2019.2 Duarte appealed, and the United States Court of Appeals granted a certificate of appealability on one ground: whether he demonstrated cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default of his claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to challenge the co-conspirator or aider-and-abettor liability jury instruction.3 The United States Court of Appeals has now determined that Duarte’s underlying ineffective-assistance claim is meritorious and that his procedural default is excused under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012).4 Accordingly, the United States Court of Appeals remanded this case “with instruction to grant a conditional writ of habeas corpus ordering Duarte to be resentenced unless the State of Nevada retries him on the attempt murder counts within a reasonable period of time.”5 In accordance with the United States Court of Appeals’ memorandum, I grant a conditional writ of habeas corpus.
ECF No. 47.
ECF Nos. 91, 92.
ECF Nos. 93, 96 at 3.
ECF No. 96 at 8–9.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that A CONDITIONAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED. The State of Nevada is directed to resentence Duarte unless it 3} retries him on the attempt-murder counts within 120 days of the date this order is filed. Dated: October 25, 2021 __(Lbeeys ‘ U.S. District Judge JenniférA. Dorsey
1]
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.