Albanese v. Apple (APPS) Phone
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *
Grace Albanese, Case No. 2:21-cv-01051-RFB-BNW Plaintiff,
ORDER v.
Apple (APPS) Phone,
Defendant.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] of the Honorable Brenda Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge, entered June 15, 2021.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 20
636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by June 29, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
. . .
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] 1s ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER. ORDERED that plaintiff Grace Albanese's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and complaint (ECF No. 1-1) are STRICKEN from the record IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court administratively close this case.
The Court Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff.
DATED: October 26, 2021. AK
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II ll United States District Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.