Bey v. Williamson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

KENNETH IMHOTEP VAUGHN BEY, Case No. 2:21-cv-01462-RFB-EJY Plaintiff,

ORDER v.

PAUL T. WILLIAMSON, JR. and

KASSANDRA L. WILLIAMSON,

Defendants.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] of the Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered August 6, 2021.

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by August 20, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.

. . .

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] 1s ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed.

The Court Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff.

DATED: October 26, 2021. AS

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II g United States District Judge

_2-